We use cookies to deliver the best possible experience on our website. To learn more, visit our Privacy Policy.
By continuing to use this site, or closing this box, you consent to our use of cookies.X

Busting Myths About Contextual Targeting

13 Sep, 2021

contextual targeting

In the wake of phasing out of third-party cookies and rising brand safety issues, advertisers are increasingly adopting contextual targeting. But there are still prevailing certain myths that are making some marketers hesitant in implementing contextual targeting.

This article tries to bust these myths, so that marketers get a clear picture on contextual targeting.

Myth 1: Contextual targeting is a simple, keyword-based approach

It is true that previously contextual targeting was based entirely on keywords, but this is not the case now. Today, we have machine learning and AI-powered contextual targeting technology that delivers unparalleled results.

Conventional contextual advertising involves targeting desired keywords in web addresses, titles, meta descriptions, tags, page content, etc. for placement of relevant ads. Similarly, conventional brand safety techniques involve avoiding ad placement against content having blacklisted keywords.

Conventional keyword-based techniques can lead to decrease in a campaign’s reach by labeling brand safe content as unsafe. For example, if a food company wants to run its ads against food content and has put alcohol in the list of blocked keywords, then by using conventional contextual advertising approach, its ads will be blocked not only against drunk driving content but also against content featuring recipes that use alcohol just as one of the ingredients. This will cast a negative impact on the campaign’s reach.

Thus, traditional keyword-based approach fails to understand nuances in context. This limitation has been overcome by contextual targeting technology powered by artificial intelligence. This technology maximizes reach, while ensuring brand safety and brand suitability.

Myth 2: Contextual targeting is less effective than cookie-based approach

This is completely untrue. Research shows that contextual ad targeting offers significantly high neural engagement and ad recall, when compared to random ad placements. Moreover, it has been found that there is a considerable increase in consumers’ purchase intent when they are exposed to ads that are contextually relevant to the content they are consuming.

The results of a marketing survey, in which over one thousand people participated, show that for the majority of consumers, it is important that ads which they see on a web page are contextually relevant to the content on that page.

Majority of the survey’s respondents showed increased favorability towards brands showing contextually relevant ads. Memorability for contextually aligned ads was also found to be significantly greater than randomly placed ads. Moreover, survey found that consumers not only prefer contextually aligned ads, but also form a better perception and opinion of them.

Myth 3: It is less cost-efficient in comparison to cookie-based advertising

When it comes to cost efficiency, contextual advertising is far better than cookie-based behavioral advertising. The cost of contextual ad impressions is considerably less than behavioral ad impressions. Research shows that effective cost per thousand impressions (eCPM), cost per click (CPC) and cost per thousand viewable impressions (vCPM) for contextual ads are significantly less than cookie-based ads.

In a study conducted in partnership with Dentsu Aegis Network, eCPM for contextual ads was found to be thirty-six percent less than that for third-party cookie-based ads. CPC for ads that were contextually targeted came out to be forty-eight percent less than CPC for ads that involved cookie-based targeting, while contextual vCPM was less than behavioral vCPM by forty-one percent.

Myth 4: Contextual targeting offers same results, irrespective of the provider

Although marketers should always go for AI-powered contextual ad targeting over conventional keyword-based technique, no two AI tech offering contextual advertising companies are equal in driving results. Marketers should choose a company that has many years of expertise and experience in contextual ad placement. The chosen company should have well-trained, refined and powerful machine learning and AI algorithms in order to drive excellent results.

The above myth-busting discussion will help marketers in better understanding contextual targeting, so that they can confidently use it to effectively achieve their advertising and brand safety goals.

Recommended posts
The Art of Choosing Right Metrics for Your Advertising
BLOG

The Art of Choosing Right Metrics for your Advertising Goal

Advertisers are artists Brainstorming outstanding solutions for driving ROI, creating eye-catching graphics, and developing the perfect CTAs. But in today’s competitive landscape, advertisers must be more than just artists. Why?  Digital advertising has forever altered the discipline by making the data more accessible ...

Twitter New Advertising Rules
BLOG

New Advertising Rules of Twitter

Hey, what’s trending?  #Facebook? #Instagram? #Twitterads - yes this seems like the right answer! In a world where people are constantly trying to restrict their time on social media, they go to Twitter for the most real-time information and relevant trending topics. The original ...

Boost Instagram Post
BLOG

How to Boost Instagram Post like a Pro!

  Do you want to run a paid social campaign? Do you wish boost engagement on your existing posts? If you answered yes to any of the above questions, then it is probably the best time for you to promote your posts. Have you ever heard about Instagram promotion (a.k.a Instagram Boosting)? It ...

Image 1
Why Google not tracking users can finally give rise to adoption of more effective alternatives.
Read More
Image 2
Survey: State of brand safety & Suitability in video.
Read More
Image 3
Protecting brand reputation with AI.
Read More